Medical information carries responsibility. Our review process is designed to ensure that what we publish reflects mainstream clinical consensus and recognised UK guidance, and that uncertainty is communicated honestly rather than glossed over.

How content is checked

  • Source alignment. Claims are checked against guidance from the MHRA, BAAPS, BAPRAS, the GMC and peer-reviewed literature.
  • Balance. Benefits, limitations and risks are presented together, not selectively.
  • Currency. Pages carry review dates and are revisited as guidance changes — for example following MHRA safety updates.
  • Plain language. Technical terms are explained on first use.

Important limitation

Review against published evidence is not the same as personalised medical advice. Only a GMC-registered specialist plastic surgeon who has assessed you in person can advise on your individual case. Our content is intended to inform that conversation, not replace it.